Document Type : Research Paper
Author
Department of Textile Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
The growing of the world’s population will lead to a noteworthy growth in textile manufacture and consumption, which will meaningfully increase the textile industry’s energy and water application and release significant amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other damaging emissions to the environment [1, 2]. Because of the increasing request for textile crops, reducing energy consumption and CO2 emissions needs novelty as well as present technologies [3-5]. The procedure of bleaching textile substrates is a challenging process [5-7].
Polyester (PET) ((C10H8O4)n) is one of the most significant and extensively used fibers in textiles owing to its unique properties (Scheme 1) [8,9].
Owing to the variability and assortment of PET bases, the quality and physical properties of fibers such as the appearance of PET like color and luster are powerfully affected by various elements [6, 10, 11]. The color of apparently white PET fibers and especially the variety of its tint attributes will affect the final color appearance of PET fabrics [12-14]. The procedures to eliminate contaminations in PET fabrics are essential in order not to damage the PET structure and to certify its whiteness [15-17]. The hydrogen peroxide bleaching procedure, which is the most applied procedure to eliminate the natural pigments from PET and cotton blends, needs high water consumption and energy input, as well as an alkaline location, stabilizer, and long incubation time at high temperatures [7, 18].
Investigations on the eco-friendly principles of textile finishing processes (such as bleaching and scouring) have been carried out to improve the quality of textile materials and save water and energy [19] (see Table 1).
Considering the benefits of an environmentally friendly process for the treatment of textile materials, this investigation aimed to explore the potential of using Direct Process of Water without heating system on the PET fabrics for the bleaching procedure (Fig. 1).
EXPERIMENTAL
Equipment and materials
This investigation employed one set of identically constructed ‘piqué’ type of knitted fabrics provided by Nature Works LLC, USA and derived from 150/144 dtex/filament Polyester yarns. This kind of manufactured goods is usually used for outerwear garments such as punches, casual clothes, active wear, women’s uniform, style wear, and children’s clothes [30].
The whiteness of the fabrics was measured as reflectance by the Color Eye-7000 Spectrophotometer, Macbet Gretage. Mettler Toledo S220-K table top pH meter was used for pH measurements. A Libror brand electronic balance (AEU210 Electronic Balance, with an accuracy of 0.0001 grams) was employed to calculate the weight loss of fabrics as a result of bleaching.
Chemicals
Acetic acid (C2H4O2, 99% pure) was supplied as a 1% solution in water used for neutralization of samples, hydrogen peroxide solution (H2O2, 30%) used for bleaching of samples and sodium pyrophosphate (Na4P2O7, MW 265.9 g/mol) utilized for pH adjustment obtained from Merck Chemical Company (Germany).
DIADAVIN® EWNOL (D-E) used for scouring agent were supplied by the Iranian Resin Saveh Company.
Bleaching
Process conditions
An average of 5 g was cut from a roll of raw PET fabric for each bleaching experiment. The cut fabric was soaked in a liquor solution. Liquids consisted of hydrogen peroxide, sodium pyrophosphate, a wetting agent (nonionic), and dilute acetic acid. The fabric/liquor ratio specified in the recipes was 1/20. 4 mL H2O2, 1 g/L Na4P2O7 and 3 g/L wetting agent were used in the experimentations. The pH of the liquids was adjusted by adding sodium pyrophosphate (TSPP). The resulting solution and PET fabric were transferred into a 100 mL beaker. Then, the fabric bleaching was carried out at different times.
In the last part of the period, the fabrics taken from the beaker were neutralized with dilute acetic acid for 5 minutes and then rinsed with tap water (Fig. 2). Subsequently, the fabric was left to dry at ambient temperature. Further investigation were carried out with bleached fabrics.
Measurements and analysis
Labeling of the PET fabrics
Labeling of PET fabrics which were bleached in different situations is briefed in Table 2.
Weight loss
The weight loss of the fabric after the bleaching process was calculated on a dry weight basis using the formula (1):
(1)
where W1 and W2 are the dry weights of the PET fabric before and after bleaching treatment, respectively.
Degree of whiteness
The color coordinates in terms of CIE Lab and CIE Lch (L*, a*, b*, c* and h̊) and whiteness indexes (W.I.) of PET fabrics were measured using a Color Eye 7000 spectrophotometer (Macbeth Gretage) under illuminant D65 light at 10 ̊observation angle using 0/d measurement. Whiteness indexes were calculated in terms of CIE Y (green) and Z (blue) reflectance components using the ASTM Method E31373 equation[31, 32].
where Y and Z are the readings of the device.
Tensile strength (RT)
Tensile strength of PET samples was determined by the Instron according to ASTM D2256/D2256M.
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Scanning Electron Microscopy examination of the fibers was performed in order to assess whether the various treatments had caused any visible degradation to the fiber surfaces [28]. A XL30 MODEL/PHYLIPS Company/Netherland instrument was employed for this purpose. In order to avoid problems due to charge build-up, the PET fabrics were previously sputter-coated with gold palladium for two minutes in a SCDOOS MODEL/Bal-Tech Company/Switzerland sputter-coating unit. The images were captured with magnifications of 15000.
Software
The use of statistics for investigating the significance of properties and making easy decisions will be the best method to analyze the results [30, 33]. In this research, the SPSS software was used for the statistical analysis of the results. The confidence level of 95% was chosen for cases that required variance analysis.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Morphology analysis by scanning electron micrographs
In Fig. 3, SEM images of unbleached raw PET fabric and PET fabrics bleached with H2O2 and Na4P2O7 are shown. The SEM image in Fig. 3a belongs to the raw PET fabric, and it is seen from the image that the fibers have homogeneous diameters. When looking at the image, it is observed that there are remains that can consist of dusts, waxes, pigments, and other organic and inorganic impurities, which are also indicated by red arrows among the PET fibers.
Fig. 3b illustrates the SEM image of PET fabric bleached with H2O2 for 1.0-hour. Looking at the image, it is observed that there are remains in the PET fibers, which are also indicated by the red arrows. It is observed that the remains cannot be removed to a large extent after bleaching with H2O2 for 1.0-hour.
Fig. 3c illustrates the SEM image of the experimental PET fabric bleached with H2O2 for 5.0 hours. In this figure, it is seen that the surface of the fibers is smoother than the raw fiber. In addition, it was observed that there was much less remain in the fabric bleached with H2O2 for 5.0 hours compared to the SEM image of raw and 1.0 hour bleached PET fabrics.
In Fig. 3d, the SEM image of the investigational PET fabric bleached with H2O2 for 10.0 hours is specified. In this figure, it is shown that the external surface of the fibers is considerably smoother than the raw fiber. Moreover, it was observed that there was notably fewer nano-sized remains in the fabric bleached with H2O2 for 10.0 hours.
Color parameters of PET materials
CIE L*a*b* color space was used to record the color coordinates [34, 35]. In CIE L*a*b* space, L* indicates the lightness (+ = lighter, – = darker) [36, 37]; the perfect white sample has L* =+100 [38, 39]. White is recognized by distributions around opposite poles of lightness coordinate in different color order system [40, 41]. As seen from the Fig. 4, the 10.0 hours bleached fabric, has the highest L* value (+91.128 %).
Table 2 presents the results of different bleaching procedures on the colorimetric attributes of the PET fabrics. White is identified by low Chroma values in various color order system [20, 42]. As seen in Table 3, the 10.0-hours bleached fabric has the lowest C* value (3.2616).
The hue angle formula is depending on which quadrant the color is located [43-45]. In Fig. 5, it appears that the tint attribute of PET bleached fabrics does not shift from the first quarter of hue area. It means that the tint effect of bleached fabrics does not change from reddish-yellowish white shade. Additionally, according to Fig. 5, the minimum value of b* belongs to 10.0-hr bleached fabric. The b* value is applied as the variance between a specimen and a standard reference color. If b* value is positive, there is more yellowness than blueness, whereas when b or b* value is negative, more blueness is observe (the samples with b* > 0 means yellowness and b* < 0 blueness[46, 47]). Therefore, sample 4 has the lowest yellow shade due to the lower b* value (3.45).
Whiteness of PET material
Table 4 and 5 exhibit the specifications of bleached PET fabrics used as substrates in this investigation. As stated by Table 3 and 4, the PET fabrics have different whiteness, yellowness, and tint attributes. Based on the CIE whiteness formula, samples are described as whites if their whiteness index (WI) and tint factor (Tw) follow from limits defined by the following relations [48, 49].
40<WI<(5Y-280), -4<TW<+2 [50, 51]
Based on the limits defined above, bleached PET fabrics are described as white. However, the whiteness index (WI) and tint factor (Tw) of virgin PET fabrics are out of limitations defined by CIE whiteness formulation.
Based on Table 4, all the bleached PET fabrics have negative value of tint factor. Samples with Tw=0 are described as bluish whites and those with positive (Tw>0) and negative (Tw<0) tint factors represent the greenish and reddish whites, correspondingly [52].
It can be indicated that 10.0-hours bleached PET fabrics with the highest whiteness index (WI=74.1) and lowest tint factor (Tw= -0.2) could be described as the whitest substrate among the three bleached fabrics. Obviously, the different whitening treatment of PET fabrics leads to its greater whiteness attribute in comparison with other white substrates. The 10.0-hours bleached PET fabric displayed the top colorimetric properties between these four substrates (WI=74.1, T=-0.2, L*=+91.128, a*=+0.106, b*=0.355, c*=3.2616, h ̊=84.11).
Weight loss studies
One of the topics to be studied in the bleaching procedure is the weight loss of the fabrics after bleaching. For this aim, the weight losses that happen as an effect of the bleaching procedures carried out at different times are estimated and specified in Fig. 6. As perceived from the diagram, it is realized that the weight loss of the fabric rises as the bleaching time increases. This can be explained by the elimination of undesirable fragments such as waxes, polymeric contaminants, pigments, lipid chemicals, microbiological contaminations and other organic and inorganic impurities from the fabric as the bleaching process continues [17, 32, 53-57]. Fig. 6 exhibits the association between the weight loss percentage of PET fabrics and bleaching time.
Tensile strength
The mechanical properties of fabrics are essential for their purposes and parts of usage [58-61]. For this aim, it is necessary that the bleached fabrics display appropriate Tensile strength. Considering this situation, the Tensile strength of pure and bleached fabrics was measured. These data were analyzed using the SPSS software. A confidence level of 95% (95% Confidence Interval for Mean) was selected for cases that required variance analysis. The results of this study are presented in Tables 6-8. It can be seen that in terms of statistical analysis, all the values have insignificant differences compared to the unbleached raw PET fabrics.
In the first cell in Table 8, which is marked with pink color, it can be seen that the tensile strength value of the raw unbleached PET fabric (code 1) do not have a significant difference with the other bleached fabrics (code 2 to 4) (because it is marked with an asterisk * have been explained at the end of the table that the asterisked values do not differ significantly from the raw sample at the 95% confidence level).
CONCLUDING
Nowadays, the textile industry has emphasized on the use of innovative pollution-free and ecologically friendly knowledge called “green technology”. In this effort an innovative bleaching procedure is applied for eliminating the contaminations of PET fabrics in the mild situations. The following conclusion can be drawn from the present study:10.0-hours bleaching procedure is described for the 10-hours bleaching of PET fabrics at 25°C in a H2O2/ Na4P2O7 liquor solution. The 10.0-hours bleached PET fabrics showed the maximum L* value (+91.128) and the minimum C* value (3.2616). The SEM image of the PET fabrics bleached with H2O2 for 10.0 hours demonstrated that there was few nano-sized remains (dusts, waxes and impurities) on the fabric bleached with H2O2. The tint attribute of PET bleached fabrics does not shift from the first quarter of the hue area. It means that the tint effect of bleached fabrics does not change from reddish-yellowish white shade.It was observed that the 10.0-hours bleached PET fabrics showed weight loss of approximately 0.07%. This can be explained through the removal of disagreeable wastes such as waxes, pectin, suits, proteins, pigments, hemicelluloses, and other impurities from the fabrics in the bleaching process. It can be realized that in terms of statistical analysis, the Tensile strength of PET fabrics have insignificant differences compared to the unbleached raw PET fabrics.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to give my heartfelt gratitude to the Faculty of Textile Engineering of Amir-Kabir University of Technology and Scientific Textile Center for their support.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.